HKU HKU Dept of Statistics & Actuarial Science, HKU
 
 

Seminar by Prof. Richard DAVIS from Department of Statistics, Columbia University


DateThursday, 18 April 2024
Time2:30 p.m. – 3:30 p.m.
VenueRR301, Run Run Shaw Building
 
TitleSample splitting and assessing goodness-of-fit of time series
Abstract

A fundamental and often final step in time series modeling is to assess the quality of fit of a proposed model to the data. Since the underlying distribution of the innovations that generate a model is often not prescribed, goodness-of-fit tests typically take the form of testing the fitted residuals for serial independence. However, these fitted residuals are inherently dependent since they are based on the same parameter estimates and thus standard tests of serial independence, such as those based on the autocorrelation function (ACF) or distance correlation function (ADCF) of the fitted residuals need to be adjusted. The sample splitting procedure in Pfister et al. (2018) is one such fix for the case of models for independent data, but fails to work in the dependent setting. In this paper sample splitting is leveraged in the time series setting to perform tests of serial dependence of fitted residuals using the ACF and ADCF. Here the first fn of the data points are used to estimate the parameters of the model and then using these parameter estimates, the last ln of the data points are used to compute the estimated residuals. Tests for serial independence are then based on these ln residuals. As long as the overlap between the fn and ln data splits is asymptotically 1/2, the ACF and ADCF tests of serial independence tests often have the same limit distributions as though the underlying residuals are indeed iid. In particular if the first half of the data is used to estimate the parameters and the estimated residuals are computed for the entire data set based on these parameter estimates, then the ACF and ADCF can have the same limit distributions as though the residuals were iid. This procedure ameliorates the need for adjustment in the construction of confidence bounds for both the ACF and ADCF in goodness-of-fit testing. (This is joint work with Leon Fernandes.)

About the speaker

Richard Davis is the Howard Levene Professor of Statistics, Department of Statistics, Columbia University. He received his Ph.D. degree in Mathematics from the University of California at San Diego in 1979. He is a fellow of IMS and ASA, and is an elected member of ISI. He was president of IMS in 2015-16 and Editor-in-Chief of Bernoulli Journal 2010-12. He is co-author of the bestselling books, Time Series: Theory and Methods. In 1998, he won (with collaborator W.T.M Dunsmuir) the Koopmans Prize for Econometric Theory. He has advised/co-advised 34 PhD students and has delivered numerous short courses on time series and heavy-tailed modeling. His research interests include time series, applied probability, extreme value theory, heavy-tailed modeling with applications to network models, and spatial-temporal modeling.